000 02637nam a2200325 i 4500
001 22247031
003 OSt
005 20250119174858.0
006 a|||||r|||| 00| 0
008 210921s2021 nyu 000 0 eng
010 _a 2021947616
020 _a9780197603680
_q(paperback)
020 _a9780197603673
_q(hardback)
020 _z9780197603697
020 _z9780197603710
020 _z9780197603703
_q(epub)
040 _aDLC
_beng
_erda
_cDLC
042 _apcc
110 _aThe Yakheads,
_eeditors.
245 0 0 _aKnowing illusion: bringing a Tibetan debate into contemporary discourse :
_bVolume II: translations / The Yakherds
263 _a1111
264 1 _aNew York :
_bOxford University Press,
_c2021.
300 _axvi, 482 pages, 24 cms ;
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
520 _a"The two volumes of this study examine fundamental issues in Buddhist thought and practice, particularly the implications of the two truths (relative and ultimate). If, as Buddhist sources claim, all perceptions are overlaid with error, is it possible to have confidence in our knowledge of the world? If buddhas only perceive reality as it is, does this entail that they are incapable of relating to ordinary beings, who view their environment through a lens of false imaginings? Taktsang Sherap Rinchen, a fifteenth-century Sakya scholar, explored the philosophical and practical ramifications of Madhyamaka antifoundationalism and accused Tsongkhapa, one of Tibet's most influential thinkers, of a fundamental incoherence that stems from an attempt to bring together the Epistemology tradition, which posits reliable epistemic instruments, and Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka, which rejects any attempt at foundationalism. Taktsang and Tsongkhapa each claim to interpret Nāgārjuna and Candrakīrti correctly. But they draw strikingly different conclusions from their respective readings. The controversy Taktsang sparked has its roots in Indian debates regarding the implications of the two truths. These were further developed in Tibet and engaged some of Tibet's best minds for centuries. Our study, the first book-length discussion of this literature, situates it in philosophical perspective, drawing parallels with contemporary global philosophy, and it also draws out the implications of the debate for the entire Buddhist enterprise of making sense of the world and presenting a path capable of leading beings to Buddhahood"--
_cProvided by publisher.
906 _a0
_bibc
_corignew
_d2
_eepcn
_f20
_gy-gencatlg
942 _2LCS
_cBOOK
_n0
999 _c2542
_d2542